Witness Murder Sparks Debate on Protection and Commission Security
Johannesburg – The murder of Marius van der Merwe, known as Witness D in the ongoing Madlanga Commission, has ignited a heated debate regarding witness protection and the security measures surrounding the commission. Van der Merwe, who gave evidence implicating a high-ranking police official in a serious crime, was shot dead last Friday. Police have confirmed that a person of interest is currently being questioned in connection with the murder.
In a media briefing yesterday, Minister in the Presidency Khumbudzo Ntshavheni addressed the public's concerns, urging caution against making assumptions about the motive behind Van der Merwe’s killing. She emphasised the importance of allowing the police to conduct a thorough investigation before drawing any conclusions.
“We do not know whether Witness D was killed because of the evidence he provided to the Madlanga commission,” Ntshavheni stated, highlighting the need to avoid premature judgements.
Van der Merwe’s testimony at the Madlanga Commission was particularly damning. He alleged that Julius Mkhwanazi, the suspended deputy police chief of the Ekurhuleni metro, instructed him to dispose of the body of a robbery suspect. The suspect, according to Van der Merwe, had been murdered during an interrogation in Brakpan back in 2022. These claims have added significant weight to the commission's investigation into alleged police corruption and misconduct.
The minister also addressed the sensitive issue of witness protection, revealing that Van der Merwe had been offered protection services by the Department of Justice, which is responsible for witness safety. However, he declined the offer.
Ntshavheni questioned, “So, if witnesses decline offers, why should we criticise the witness protection services?”
She acknowledged the inherent challenges in providing foolproof protection, stating, “Of course, the witness protection service will never be perfect, but it is a work in continuous improvement. As witnesses and threats are identified, the system has to be strengthened. We can never claim it is perfect, but it is a work in progress, learning lessons and improving over time.”
The minister’s comments have sparked further discussion about the effectiveness of the country's witness protection programme and the reasons why individuals might choose to decline such assistance, even when facing potential threats.
Concerns have also been raised about the overall security arrangements at the Madlanga Commission itself. Ntshavheni addressed these concerns, stating that the commission has already taken steps to enhance security.
“The commission indicated that they have met and articulated interventions to strengthen their security measures,” she explained.
Ntshavheni reassured the public that any vulnerabilities identified would be addressed, adding, “If weaknesses exist, they will be addressed, but we leave that to the commission.” The specifics of these interventions have not been publicly disclosed, but it is understood that they include a review of access control procedures and increased surveillance.
Beyond the immediate concerns surrounding the Van der Merwe case and the Madlanga Commission, Ntshavheni also used the briefing to address broader claims about the state of South Africa. She urged caution against labelling institutions without carefully considering the facts, a comment seemingly directed at those who have described South Africa as a "mafia state".
The investigation into Van der Merwe’s murder is ongoing, and the police have not yet released any details about the person of interest they are questioning. The circumstances surrounding his death remain unclear, and authorities are appealing to the public for any information that might assist in their investigation.
The Madlanga Commission continues its work, with heightened security measures now in place. The commission's findings are expected to have significant implications for the future of policing and governance in the Ekurhuleni metro and potentially beyond. The death of Van der Merwe has undoubtedly cast a shadow over the proceedings, underscoring the risks faced by those who come forward to expose corruption and wrongdoing. The debate about witness protection and the safety of whistleblowers is likely to continue in the weeks and months ahead.
Follow Us on Twitter
