In a disturbing case unfolding at the Mitchells Plain Magistrate's Court, a 35-year-old teacher from Harvester Primary School has been charged with sexual grooming of a child and exposing a minor to explicit material. The teacher, who cannot be named until she pleads, appeared in court on Monday as part of a bail application.
The court heard shocking details about the interactions between the accused and her 13-year-old Grade 7 victim. According to Warrant Officer Roland Peters, the investigating officer in the case, the teacher initiated conversations with the boy on TikTok, where she allegedly sought to establish a casual relationship. Peters testified that the accused asked the boy to call her by her first name instead of "ma’am," stating that the latter made her feel old. “The messages said: ‘don’t f**king call me ma’am, call me [by my name],’” he recounted, highlighting the inappropriate nature of their exchanges.
Further details emerged about the circumstances surrounding the video. After sending it, the teacher reportedly realised the gravity of her actions and the potential loss of her job. In a desperate attempt to retrieve the situation, she asked the boy to delete the video. However, he allegedly demanded R500 in exchange for its deletion. Eventually, the boy decided against pursuing the payment, telling her, “her life is already over.”
The State announced its intention to oppose the teacher’s bail application, citing public outrage and the potential risk to her safety as key concerns. The prosecution argued that the community's strong reaction and the media coverage surrounding the case warranted her continued detention.
Conversely, the teacher’s legal counsel argued for her release on bail, asserting that she would fully cooperate with authorities, including handing over her cellphone. The lawyer claimed that her client posed no flight risk and was a first-time offender, promising not to repeat the alleged offence.
During the court proceedings, the magistrate noted that the judicial system generally leans towards granting bail unless there are compelling reasons against it. “The courts are required to lean in favour of granting bail… the State doesn’t worry about the child’s safety or other children,” the magistrate remarked, suggesting that the prosecution's main argument against bail was based on public interest rather than concrete evidence of risk.
In response to the court’s deliberations, members of the Mitchells Plain community and parents from Harvester Primary School have rallied together, presenting a petition opposing the teacher’s release on bail. This collective action underscores the deep concern felt by the community regarding the safety of their children.
As the case develops, the matter has been postponed to 1 July to allow the State further time to prepare and for arguments to be presented. The situation continues to evoke strong emotions among parents and residents, highlighting the importance of ensuring the safety and well-being of children in educational environments.
Follow Us on Twitter
